In what feels like the courtroom equivalent of a reality TV roast, a federal judge in California gave President Joe Biden a firm "No, you didn't" moment over his pardon of Hunter Biden, while dismissing Hunter Biden's criminal tax case.

Judge Mark Scarsi wasn’t here for the sentimental dad routine, declaring:

"Sure, the President can grant clemency, but rewriting history? That’s not in the job description."

Hunter Biden’s “full and unconditional” pardon came with a generous serving of eyebrow-raising revelations: tax evasion that continued well after he sobered up, all while indulging in “luxury clothing, escort services, and even footing the bill for his daughter’s law school tuition.” Turns out, sobriety didn’t just bring clarity—it brought some creative accounting too.

Scarsi’s response? A judicial version of "Really, bro?"

If pardons were PR campaigns, this one backfired harder than a cheap firework. Somewhere, the Constitution is rolling its eyes and muttering, “Didn’t sign up for this.”